TIF Sunshine: "It burns, it burns!" UPDATED 1X

by: Sandra_Verthein

Fri Mar 13, 2009 at 13:56:56 PM CDT


[UPDATE: Per Progress Illinois (http://www.progressillinois.com) Alderman Margaret Laurino, Chair of the Committee on Economic, Capital and Technoloy Development, has signed on as a primary sponsor.  This is a good sign for a positive result at Monday's hearing.]

If you don't live in Cook County, skip to the next diary. But if you do, read on for the who why and when on the TIF Sunshine Ordinance, and how you can help stick it to the man by sending an email.

With poll!
Sandra_Verthein :: TIF Sunshine: "It burns, it burns!" UPDATED 1X

On Monday there will be a hearing at a joint meeting of the City of Chicago Committee on Economic, Capital and Technology and the Committee on Finance to consider the TIF (Tax Increment Financing) Sunshine Ordinance that was recently introduced by Chicago Alderman Scott Waguespack and Alderman Manny Flores. TIFs as practiced in Chicago are, to quote the Sun-Times, basically "Mayor Daley's private piggy bank". Their use and mis-use have a huge effect on the finances of the City of Chicago AND on Cook County. Though this is a mild reform, it is an important first step in cleaning up this system.

What's the ordinance all about? From the Chicago Reader:

[...] If passed the ordinance would mandate that by the end of this year the city post every specific agreement, amendment, attachment, order, audit, and record for every use of money from Chicago’s roughly 160 TIF districts.

Flores and Waguespack were outraged by the lack of information available to the public—and even to them as elected officials—during the Republic Windows and Doors fiasco, when the company abruptly closed up shop despite agreeing to keep jobs in Chicago in return for $10 million in TIF subsidies. “We are committed to incremental movement on this issue, and it starts with transparency,” Flores said Wednesday. “President Obama has promised transparency with the use of federal money. We should also offer some in the city of Chicago.”

To access TIF records currently, Waguespack said, aldermen, affected businesses, and other members of the public have to dig through hundreds of pages of co! uncil journals or send in Freedom of Information requests. He argued that there's no excuse for [not] making the information more accessible. “The technology clearly exists,” he said. “This shouldn’t be an issue.” [...]

Why is this important? Well, how about the fact that MillerCoors was just approved for $6 million of our TIF dollars to renovate their offices. In other words, money was diverted out of the general revenue stream -- the one that goes to in part to fund Cook County services, as well as schools, libraries and parks -- and has now ended up as a corporate subsidy to MillerCoors.

Nice.

You can see the ordinance as submitted here: http://www.chicityclerk.com/legislation/sublegmatters/2009/feb11/Alderman/32a%20Waguespack%20&%201%20Flores%20etal%20PO2009-1022.pdf

At the time of submittal (which was at the February City Council meeting) the ordinance had the following sponsors: Waguespack (32), Flores (1), Fioretti (2), Dowell (3), Preckwinkle (4), Foulkes (15), Cochran (20), Muñoz (22), Dixon (24), E. Smith (28), Carothers (29), Reboyras (30), Colon (35), Allen (38), Reilly (42), Daley (43), Tunney (44), Schulter (47), Moore (49) and Stone (50).

The breakdown for Monday's meeting is (I have put a + next to those from the sponsor list above):

Committee on Economic, Capital and Technology Development Margaret Laurino (Chair)
Michael R. Zalewski (Vice-Chair)
Allen +
Banks
Cardenas
Colon +
Daley +
Flores +
Foulkes
Jackson
Lane
Mitts
Rugai
Tunney +

Committee on Finance
Edward M. Burke (Chair)
Patrick J. O'Connor (Vice-Chair)
Allen +
Austin
Balcer
Banks
Beale
Burnett
Cardenas
Carothers +
Colon +
Daley +
Doherty
Hairston
Harris
Laurino
Levar
Mell
Moore +
Munoz +
Ocasio
Olivo
Preckwinkle +
Pope
Rugai
Schulter +
Shiller
E. Smith
M. Smith
Solis
Stone +
Suarez
Thomas
Tunney +
Zalewski

If you live in Chicago, e-mail your Alderman about this TODAY, and send a copy of your email to Ald. Scott Waguespack at 32ndward@gmail.com. Sending the copy to him is very important as Ald. Waguespack would like to bring those emails with him to Monday's hearing.

You can look up your Alderman's email address here: http://www.chicityclerk.com/citycouncil/alderman/find.html

And if you live in suburban Cook County, well, I guess you just have to hope that a few of us Chicagoans care enough about what is going on to keep you from continuing to get screwed.

Poll
IVI-IPO has proposed a moritorium on TIFs until reform can happen.
I support a state-wide moritorium.
I support one only in Cook County.
I support one only in Chicago.
I do not suport any moritorium.
I don't know enough about TIFs to have an answer.
I don't know what a TIF is.

Results

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
A million here, a million there ... (3.67 / 3)
I actually diaried about the MillerCoors deal last July:

http://www.prairiestateblue.co...

At the time the city said it would be giving MillerCoors $2.5 to $5 million, now here it turns out to be $6 million.

You know what they say, a million here, a million there, pretty soon it adds up to real money.

But seriously, think what your local social service agency could do with that money.  I know the Greater Chicago Food Depository always talks about how they can provide four meals with $1.  So that's 4 million meals that could have been provided just with the "inflation" on this TIF give-away.

Basic stuff: The common wealth should be used for the common good, not to enrich the well-connected few.  


No Poll Choice Reflects My View (4.00 / 1)
I believe that the citizens of each municipality should make their own choices about TIFs.

Interestingly, I have just been to a "meet and greet" for local candidates where one of the slates running for Village Board favors abolishing our Oak Park TIFs. Their argument is that, while the TIFs served a useful purpose in supporting needed infrastructure improvements when they were established 25 years ago, that need has passed. For the past dozen years or more support for developers has actually limited the growth of assessed valuation in the TIF districts. And meanwhile, of course, the money is not available for other purposes Village-wide.

I find this argument reasonably persuasive. But I think it is a decision that needs to be made by Oak Parkers, not by oursiders who do not understand Oak Park's situation and needs. And by the same token, I do not think I should be telling Chicagoans what they should do about their TIFs.

Bill Thomasson

Permission to reprint explicitly granted


Prairie State Blue
Front Page - Back Page


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


1 User(s) logged on.
Search




Advanced Search


Misc
View
Powered by: SoapBlox