Quinn: Move 2010 primary to September?

by: curmudgeon

Fri Jan 30, 2009 at 20:34:27 PM CST


According to the Trib, Pat Quinn is suggesting that Illinois delay the 2010 primary election until September.  It seems that the politicians are always moving the primary dates around, usually for some partisan purpose, and I'm not sure this is a Good Thing.  Moving the primary date back and forth makes it hard for people to plan for their campaigns.

Still, I'm not too fond of the way the primaries have been earlier and earlier with each election cycle.

What I wonder now is whether Quinn sees this move as a one-of, or is he planning on a September primary to become a regular thing?

curmudgeon :: Quinn: Move 2010 primary to September?

SPRINGFIELD, Ill. - Illinois should delay next year's primary election by seven months so politicians have more time to focus on state government before turning their attention to politics, new Gov. Pat Quinn said Friday.

Quinn wants to move the 2010 primary election to September from February. The general election is in November.

In theory, the delay would mean more time before political maneuvering kicks into high gear. Quinn said elected officials need that time to address problems left behind by former Gov. Rod Blagojevich -- things like government corruption, budget deficits and rising unemployment.

"It would give us the opportunity to spend a whole year repairing damage. I think that's what you do after a political disaster and a natural disaster," Quinn said. "You have to repair the damage instead of doing the same old thing."

A delay might also help Quinn politically.

He would have more time in office to build a relationship with voters and cement himself as the incumbent before facing a challenge in the Democratic primary. It would also provide more time to raise campaign money. As lieutenant governor, Quinn did not build up a large war chest.

Quinn could face a slew of challengers, including Comptroller Dan Hynes.

Hynes hadn't reviewed the idea of moving the primary and had no reaction Friday, a spokeswoman said. Aides to two other potential candidates, Attorney General Lisa Madigan and Treasurer Alexi Giannoulias, didn't immediately return calls seeking comment.

Under the current election schedule, candidates have to start preparing in late 2009 for the primary. Then the rest of the year would be dominated by the November general election.

Illinois wouldn't be the only state with a late primary. New York also holds the election in September, with a presidential primary in February.

Rep. Jack Franks, D-Woodstock, said he has introduced legislation to delay the primary. He said it would give Quinn two full legislative sessions to focus on government before an election.

Illinois primary elections were typically held in March until last year when lawmakers scooted it up to February in an effort to help Barack Obama's presidential campaign.

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
The delay would be to Quinn's advantage (0.00 / 0)
The delay helps Quinn because the petition collection is happening in July of 2009.  He will barely get into office and will need to start gearing up the campaign.  He also will not have much time to get things accomplished.

 It also is in favor of anyone looking for a primary challenge in the  Senate .  They will have more time to raise money and to get a campaign together.

  I favor moving the primary back in general though because the February or March primary is so early in the cycle and means campaigns need to gear up really early.
Also it is still cold in February and March so it makes going door to door difficult.

September seems a little late but July would be a good month.   Illinois has one of the earliest regular primaries and it would not hurt to move it to the summer or early fall.


Really good point (4.00 / 1)
about the weather in February.

But I'm still not clear if Quinn means this change to be permanent.  I really don't like the idea of adhocing such changes just to benefit certain incumbent officials.


[ Parent ]
Has to be a one-off (0.00 / 0)
In 2012, a September primary would fall after the national conventions. Unless Illinois shelled out good dough to hold a separate presidential primary, and I can't imagine any Illinois politician stupid enough to propose THAT. Such a taxpayer-be-damned proposal would immediately cost my vote, regardless of any other consideratins.

I also find it hard to imagine holding the primary on one date in presidential years and another in gubernatorial years. That just adds unnecessary confusion, although it's not as absurd as two separate primaries.

Bill Thomasson

Permission to reprint explicitly granted


[ Parent ]
see the point, but see a downside too (0.00 / 0)
I can see Quinn's point, but I don't like changing election rules late in the cycle.

It seems like it has potential for abuse if the people in power can make huge changes late in the process.


I agree (0.00 / 0)
This can't be a one off.  If it changes then the change needs to be in place for several election cycles.

Setting precedent that the incumbent can change the cycle at any time is really bad and really dangerous.

The early primary already favors the incumbent because they do not need to gear up as much as the challenger.  Being able to change for any reason really puts a challenger off base because they have less ability to plan ahead.

 In fact I would bet that Lisa Madigan is less likely to agree with this because she has already put the planning in for an early primary.  She would have a advantage over Quinn because she already has a large war chest and an organization.  Waiting until September gives him time to overcome some of that advantage.


IVI-IPO has supported a later primary for years... (0.00 / 0)
(Though, obviously not for presidential years) for the reasons data mentioned in his first post, as independent progressives may have a harder time getting people to pass in the winter.  Summer primaries run in to the problem of vacations (especially for people with kids).  Later primaries (Sept. and after) make it harder for a new candidate without a head of steam to compete in the general.  Spring primaries had been where we generally fell, but we will take a new look in our Legislative Action Committee as we have now hired a lobbyist in Springfield, and hope to be part of the mix in shaping what goes forward this year.  

Illinois primary should be later (0.00 / 0)
I wrote a fairly extensive column elsewhere, with links to some references, in November on this topic.  See Fix this Cycle! Illinois' Too-Long Elections. The arguments for a later primary are not just the money but turnout, participation, etc. This should be a no-brainer for good-government advocates, and I'm glad to see Quinn bringing this front-burner his first week in office.

The historic IVI-IPO position for a spring primary made sense because summer indeed starts presenting travel issues (although with early and absentee voting, hard to imagine that would be any more problematic than the Chicago "snowbird" phenomenon, or travel during spring breaks). A September primary presents a very short window for framing real issues between party nominees if there is any significance to the general election (as opposed to districts where in essence the primary is the real battle). The school and business cycles also argue against a September primary IMHO. August is still the heaviest vacation month and so a lot of grassroots effort would be wasted. May, June, or even July seem optimal, ideally on a weekend -- but not the Taste :)


Prairie State Blue
Front Page - Back Page


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


0 User(s) logged on.
Search




Advanced Search


Misc
View
Powered by: SoapBlox