The Next Senator and the Six Emergencies

by: Jeff Smith

Fri Aug 01, 2008 at 19:58:53 PM CDT


In my last posts on what I want to see in the next senator from Illinois, I mentioned a political dynamic by which we ignore looming national emergencies. I choose the word "emergency" because "crisis" has been so overplayed that it no longer conveys the necessary degree of alarm. An emergency is something that needs to be addressed now, the way that you deal with a fire in the kitchen before you start re-wallpapering the living room or tuckpointing the chimney.

Any glance at a Democratic Party platform or IVI-IPO candidate questionnaire reveals that there's no shortage of issues in America to address. However, right now at least six problems have been backburnered for so long by our political culture of deception that they are a fire in the kitchen. If not tended to now, they will burn the house down.  

Jeff Smith :: The Next Senator and the Six Emergencies
They are as follows:
  1. Our Environmental Emergency.  This encompasses more than global warming. We face simultaneous emergencies of water, food, desertification, rivers, oceans, and population, among other eco-catastrophes. Combined, this is the #1 emergency because the planet is in danger. This planet. Our only one. Any questions?

  2. An Equality Emergency.  The current grotesque imbalance of wealth, income, and power in America not only underpins most of our economic woes and crises, such as the mortgage foreclosure whirlpool, but threatens to undermine social stability and democracy itself. This imbalance, a result of bad policies, is now also a cause, creating a feedback loop. It's an emergency because it's getting worse, not better, and we're at a tipping point.

  3. A Freedom Emergency.  Privacy and civil liberties both have their back to the wall after 7 years of post-9/11. So do fair elections. Unprecedented information technology has created unprecedented ability to leverage power, a perpetual propaganda terrorizes the public, and you have to search far to find a politician doing anything except shrugging. Since rights to liberty, privacy, and electoral integrity secure all others, a threat to them threatens everything else we hope to do.

  4. Fiscal Disaster.  The time bombs of Social Security, Medicare, pensions, and an aging America aren't going away. Our massive deficits have made it more, not less, likely that they'll explode. The ticks are getting louder - or would be if they weren't silenced by a blanket of deception and a chorus of distraction. This is not an emergency that will destroy us next year, or the next, but must be taken now, on an emergency basis, because the longer we wait the tougher it will be to fix.  

  5. Empire As Emergency. Most of the other emergencies above - arguably all -- relate to our militarily maintaining an empire that few politicians even dare acknowledge. We don't need just to reallocate some resources - we need an about-face in a policy of perpetual militarism that has little to do with protecting average Americans.

  6. Shredding the Social Fabric.  At bottom, there aren't enough guns or police to hold America together; that requires trust and consensus. That fabric has been rent and ripped by decades of division. Some of these divisions are real and too long neglected; others are manufactured and exploited. But no matter where they came from, we need to address, now, the cumulative impact of assaults on community and common vision that, for our first two centuries, helped bind us together, because without this fabric, we lack the strength to withstand other crises.

This is not my "wish list." These are basics that I want to see more members of Congress make top priorities. I'd like our next Senator to show that he or she recognizes the emergency nature of what we have to do, and has the courage to take leadership even where polls suggest that other issues pay quicker political dividends.

All of these emergencies were long in the making, but at any given moment were relegated to a Scarlett-like "I'll think about that tomorrow," because the solutions seemed long-range. Our ever-decreasing-attention-span politics, condensed into 30-second attack ads delivered in a video-game blur, punishes thought, rewarding oversimplification and immediate gratification.

Of course I want any candidate to address many other issues comprehensively. But not to lead with them. Going for the easy shots while avoiding the tough calls is why we are where we are, at all levels of government. Progressives rail against shortsighted corporations that think only about the next quarterly profits; the political analogue is following polls, continually looking only to the next election. At risk of contradicting Alinsky, I believe that real change means changing the conversation.

Addressing these emergencies may not provide the camaraderie or political reward that some others might. It may be hard and dirty work, unglamorous, like fighting a fire or pumping out a flooded basement. But it's what needs to be done, and done now. By, among others, the next Senator from Illinois.

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
one other little one.. (0.00 / 0)
Energy as Emergency..or as Jim Kunstler puts it, "The Long Emergency". With the world being on the downslope of fossil fuel production, and our entire way of American life dependent on cheap abundant energy (transportation and food production being two huge factors), the next (and of course current) emergency that will take place over the next 20 years will be the production of energy. Outside of a few sops to "green" "alt" etc etc, there is clearly no plan. My fellow citizens seem utterly unaware, except when they fill up the SUV to drive 40 miles one way to their financial services job..while wondering why the price of Cheez Doodlzz is so gursh fersaken high.

We need to make "other arrangements"..now. Light rail, hydro power, sustainable farms surrounding small sustainable towns, and the acknowledgment that the Suburban Dream (I would call it a nightmare)is over.  The next senator from Illinois will have to step up with the ugly news that the par-tay is over.

...We've been fortunate to have a run of cheap energy for a long time, and have squandered this resource by building American Suburbia. Unfortunately, the combination of the Energy Emergency with Global Warming seems to indicate that the "emergency" is indeed..the Long Emergency. The legacy we hand to our kids is one of overindulged adolescents who have squandered every opportunity to change things before it was too late.


energy as emergency (0.00 / 0)
I agree on energy as emergency, altho I see great promise in renewables and conservation. It's hard to draw bright lines between categories; some would say energy is part of the environmental emergency. Some would say it's part of the equality/economy emergency. I'd go a step further and say that energy is part of a broader, largely-unmentioned crisis in resources of all types. Energy, water, food, but also a lot of important durables. China-India are accelerating demand for a lot of stuff.

I don't believe that we have as of yet "squandered every opportunity." I believe we are in the middle of a critical opportunity, and that we still have a chance. If I didn't believe that, I wouldn't be posting here or active in the political sphere.


[ Parent ]
Ways to address these emergencies (3.00 / 1)
I'm in total agreement that these are emergencies, especially the "shredding the social fabric" problem. These issues are fundamental to the health of our nation and our neighborhoods and must be addressed now.

Maybe what I'm about to say is already assumed here, if so I apologize for preaching to the choir.

I think we need to be explicit in suggesting steps to address these emergencies and how they should be tackled by the next president, senator, or even an alderman.  The "change agent" you hope we get in public office needs to start off with some aggressive education of voters about these emergencies, either before or in concert with offering any new legislation or executive order solutions.

Until the public understands the impact of these emergencies on our daily lives and future options, there will be no broad support for fundamental change.  The gap between how things actually work and what the public actually understands about that is vast.  I bet I'm not the only one here who finds it galling that many people I know, and so many of our neighbors, haven't a clue about what the term "empire" means in relation to our country.  Although the support for Obama seems to indicate that most voters do at least have a feeling that something is wrong and needs changing, not enough really understand much about the emergencies you've noted.

If our next change agent leaders (assuming real ones, like Dennis Kucinich, aren't eaten alive first) don't devote lots of work to create public awareness of these issues, if voters fail to "get it," then those who are satisfied with the status quo will continue to triumph.

Finally, in relation to my suggestion, maybe another emergency is the utter uselessness of our nation's mainstream news media (corporate, commercial, and entertainment driven) as a tool to help inform and educate citizens about what's really going on.


MSM (4.00 / 1)
Much of the MSM seems to be buying into the "mental recession"  line that says if we just click our ruby slippers together three times, all our problems will disappear. There seems to be a desperation in that, like sandbagging river floodwaters.  I was shocked to read yesterday in the WSJ that a blip in GDP growth last quarter shows that we aren't really in that bad of an economic funk. Never mind Ford's record loss, 16-year-lows in car purchases, record recent home price drops, record losses in financial companies...

A real problem is that politicians think that voters can't handle reality. This is true among progressives as well -- at two different panels I attended at Netroots Nation, prominent leaders parroted the line about "the people" not wanting to hear that they have to sacrifice, that taxes might need to be raised, that lifestyles may need to be changed, and that therefore Democrats and progressives need to ID issues on which voters will respond, and, I guess, sneak into office with an agenda they're not telling the voters about, then hope to pass it.

In other words, don't talk about peak oil, don't talk about global warming; only talk about gas prices.

My take is different; I think the country can't handle any more denial, or the corrosion of pandering. I also believe profoundly that voters are ready for -- even hungry for -- straight talk, even if some of the facts are now quite unpleasant. With all our faults we are a resilient people and capable of responding to challenge. What we need are more politicians willing to risk appealing to the best in the electorate, rather than a more liberal version of appeal to self-interest.


[ Parent ]
Comments (2.00 / 3)
Let me start by saying that my negative reactions are mostly to you rhetoric (words such as "extreme" and "fear-mongering" come to mind). And to the accompanying vagueness that makes it hard to grasp what you're saying in any concrete way. I doubt if we have many substantive disagreements, although there are a few.

So on the specific comments:

Environmental Emergency. I'm confused because, aside from global warming, it's not obvious what the U.S. government can do about these problems. Maybe there are some things, but without concrete details it's hard to see what they might be.

Equality Emergency. I think this is more of a rhetorical disagreement. I agree that the salaries some sports stars are drawing are obscene and that we need to adjust the tax structure to have them pay more of their fair share. But I can't see calling this "an emergency."

Freedom Emergency. Clearly and solely a rhetorical disagrement. This is a fight that has been going on for the 60 years I've been old enough to be aware of such things. Bush's actions have created the worst threat of the past half-century (notice I don't say 60 years), but the push-back is already occurring. We need to continue pushing back. But calling it an emergency suggests it is something that can be fixed once and for all, and that is a very dangerous meme.

Fiscal Disaster. We agree that the massive deficit is a disaster in the making that needs to be dealt with quickly. And estimates say that Medicare will be broke within the decade. I continue to be amazed that nobody is seriously addressing this near-term issue. But we don't even know if Social Security has a problem. The over-conservative estimates of the Social Security Board say reserves will be exhausted in the 2040s, but more realistic estimates of economic growth say they will last forever. I don't think we should "fix" (i.e., trash) a system that's probably not even broken.

Pensions? I don't concretely know what you are talking about. Some corporations and governmnet bodies that offer defined-benefit pensions are in trouble because they mismanaged their pension funds in the 1990s. But others aren't. And most Americans have defined-contribution rather than defined-benefit pensions.

Empire as Emergency. I have no idea what you're talking about. I have mostly heard the term following Bush's stupid and poorly motivated invasion of Iraq. But aside from Iraq, I've never seen any concrete meaing attached to the term. If you have something specific in mind, plase let us know.

Shredding the Social Fabric. I usually refer to "the politics of divisiveness," but I think we're referring to the same thing. I date this rather specifically from the Contract with America, and I am very much looking toward Obama to reach out to those who may disagree and to bridge the gap. As I said in a previous thread, a Senator who would support his efforts would be a Good Thing.

Bill Thomasson

Permission to reprint explicitly granted


Concrete Examples (3.00 / 1)
It's not obvious what the U.S. government can do about environmental problems? Really?

C02 policies are just a part. H2O strategies are as important, if not more so, particularly in the middle east. Off the top of my head, three concrete policy actions: Implement more aggressive renewable energy portfolio, reduce oil industry subsidizes, and develop incentives to re- localize agriculture.

The equality emergency is hardly a rhetorical disagreement and ties directly to your mention of deficit as disaster. Think in terms of tax policy, particular progressive taxation. Implementing a progressive tax scheme in Illinois by itself redresses most of Illinois' structural budget woes.

The "Freedom Emergency" a rhetorical disagrement? Hardly. It's happened and is happening. The Patriot Act, FISA legislation, etc are both concrete examples (and boots). And no, an emergency does not suggest something can be fixed once and for all. Think about a kitchen fire. They occur. They are an emergency and if one should happen in your kitchen you put it out before it consumes the house. You don't ignore it just because it's happened before.

For a concrete example on pension problems, call Carol Ronen. She can explain. For a concrete example of Empire as Emergency, see Britian. ;-)


[ Parent ]
Spouse Requests Retraction (4.00 / 1)
My beloved (English) husband would prefer I cite some other example of Empire as Emergency. I'm happy to oblige, dear. For a concrete example of Empire as Emergency, see Rome. ;-))

[ Parent ]
??? (0.00 / 0)
C02 policies are just a part. H2O strategies are as important, if not more so, particularly in the middle east. Off the top of my head, three concrete policy actions: Implement more aggressive renewable energy portfolio, reduce oil industry subsidizes, and develop incentives to re- localize agriculture.

And these US government actions will affect water in the Middle East exactly how?

The equality emergency is hardly a rhetorical disagreement and ties directly to your mention of deficit as disaster. Think in terms of tax policy, particular progressive taxation. Implementing a progressive tax scheme in Illinois by itself redresses most of Illinois' structural budget woes.

A U.S. Senator has nothing to do with the structure of Illinois state taxes. At the federal level, I certainly think that people drawing obscenely high salaries should pay more taxes. But the only purpose of calling it an "emergency" seems to be to get the matter laughed off the table and make sure nothing happens.

The "Freedom Emergency" a rhetorical disagrement? Hardly. It's happened and is happening. The Patriot Act, FISA legislation, etc are both concrete examples (and boots). And no, an emergency does not suggest something can be fixed once and for all. Think about a kitchen fire. They occur. They are an emergency and if one should happen in your kitchen you put it out before it consumes the house. You don't ignore it just because it's happened before.

If it's not a rhetorical disagreement, then it's a grammatical disagreement. To me, once a kitchen fire is out, it's out. It's not something you continue dealing with on a daily basis.  So, whether it's a matter of rhetoric or grammar, calling the present situation an emergency invites complacency a little way down the road. And that way lies tyranny. "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance."

For a concrete example on pension problems, call Carol Ronen.

So you're saying that Ronen is worried the State of Illinois will not have money to pay her pension. Maybe so, since Illinois is one of the entities that has mismanaged its pension funds. But when you use the generic term "pensions" it's not immediately obvious that's what you're talking about.

For a concrete example of Empire as Emergency, see [Rome]. ;-)

And how, concretely, does this relate to future U.S. foreign policy? What policies are you proposing we adopt and what policies -- leaving aside Iraq-like stupidity -- are you proposing we avoid?

Bill Thomasson

Permission to reprint explicitly granted


[ Parent ]
;-) (0.00 / 0)
You do know that this symbol means we're having a little fun, right?

My comments (and my point) aren't so slippery as to merit such dissection, Bill, but as long as we're playing, here ya go: the Golan Heights and West Bank aquifers; stop shifting the sand, man, the point was about equality; oh pleeeeze; I'm afraid Carol has already spent her capacity for worry (thank god she has that pension); and what am I proposing we avoid? Well, I hadn't proposed anything, though I think now I'll nominate this kind of discourse.

No need to put words in my mouth, Bill. Clearly, I generate enough of them on my own. However, I do like how your questions seem to sprout from any soil. ;-)))  


[ Parent ]
Actually ... (0.00 / 0)
while I do know that symbol, it's the sort of thing my poor old eyes tend to miss. Call me old-fashion -- I guess I am -- but I've always prefered the old convention of descriptive words in angle brackets. Or square barackets, since the software here can't seem to handle angle brackets. Not only harder for people with poor eyesight to miss but something that doesn't call for interpretation.

Bill Thomasson

Permission to reprint explicitly granted


[ Parent ]
fear itself (0.00 / 0)
Bill:

I hope that I have the time and ability in future posts to harmonize our positions, which I expect are more similar than different. By definition, my previous post was not specific, because it's an outline, and even at that was 659 words. I plan to elaborate on each of these points in successive posts.

"Fear-mongering" is an easy pejorative to throw about, but unwarranted here. I have been an optimist all my life, with a near-unquenchable faith in the power of good will, hard work, truth, and love. But I am worried as never before for our future, and our children's future. As are many, many other Americans. And I'm not going to apologize for that.

Let me put it this way: there's a bumper sticker that says "If you're not angry, you're not paying attention." While bumper stickers by definition oversimplify, the catchy ones usually have an element of truth to them. I think that anyone who is not at least a little scared is, in fact, not paying attention, or is simply reading and listening to what we are fed daily, or is perhaps in too comfortable a position to relate to what the average person faces.

Is someone who yells "fire" if there is, in fact, a fire, "fear-mongering"? It's not alarmist to shout an alarm if there is cause for alarm. Events and statistics show that on many fronts, what we are seeing in the areas I list is largely unprecedented, at least in my lifetime, and the confluence is certainly unprecedented.

We have been driven by fear for years now, but fear of the wrong things, thanks to misdirection stoked mainly by the right wing. Meanwhile, real warning signs are ignored.

A healthy instinct to avoid real bad outcomes should be part of what drives us to change policy direction. The challenge is how to do so without acting out of panic. I am posting, and am active, only because I believe our challenges, while urgent, are yet addressable.


[ Parent ]
Jaff" (0.00 / 0)
Yes, as I said, I think our positions on substantive issues are not greatly differnt. I look forward to your expanding on these points later.

Our major difference is that I don't believe fear leads to rational, well-considered action. it leads either the paralysis or to panicky, ill-considered actions that don't solve the problem. If I want to think about what needs to be done, I need to put aside any fear I may feel.

Bill Thomasson

Permission to reprint explicitly granted


[ Parent ]
Your word choice (0.00 / 0)
is hyperbolic, and I can't believe someone who dared point this out got troll-rated.

Not really (0.00 / 0)
Jeff made it clear he was tweeking the linguistic paradigm, so to speak, to rattle our mental attics so we might think about these issues differently. He alerted us to the devise.  

[ Parent ]
Fiscal emergency (0.00 / 0)
The fiscal disaster, emergency is too bland a word, is merely aggravated by:
The time bombs of Social Security, Medicare, pensions, and an aging America aren't going away.

From the end of WWII until 1980, the national debt grew in dollar amount but shrank in percent (or months) of GDP. Then Reagan got in complaining about the increase in dollar amounts. He not only grew the debt in dollar amounts but more than doubled it in months of GDP. Botth Bushes have continued that proram.
We're nearly back to where we were at teh end of WWII, and the only hope they hold out is that their policy of tax cuts for the rich will finally work to grow the economy more rapidly than usual -- instead of less rapidly as their policies have accomplished evry time they have been tried.
We should have been saving for retirement; instead we have been borrowing as though there were no tomorrow.

Prairie State Blue
Front Page - Back Page


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


0 User(s) logged on.
Search




Advanced Search


Misc
View
Powered by: SoapBlox