The Next Senator from Illinois: Ending the Culture of Deception

by: Jeff Smith

Thu Jul 17, 2008 at 16:24:54 PM CDT


The title of Scott McClellan's recent confessional referred to the "culture of deception" in Washington. Liberals took great joy in this, but McClellan was not referring only to this administration and Iraq. Chief among the deceptions practiced as a bipartisan matter of course, in government at all levels, is ignoring the elephant in the room. Playing "never mind the man behind the curtain." I.e., hiding from the American public the degree to which things have become really screwed up. To me, a necessary quality of Illinois's next Senator is that they break this mold.

Political happy-talk combined with the misdirection of emotionally-charged social wedge issues and identity politics is the reason why, over and over, we seem to be constantly "surprised" by disasters that, in truth, were years if not decades in the making, from massive pension underfunding at the local and state levels, to global warming and acid rain ignored by our federal government and international bodies. We as the American public are in turn all too willing to tune out stats on "boring" or difficult topics like trade agreements or mortgage underwriting practices, and engage in the fantasy that "things aren't that bad," which allows us to ignore problems, watch Dancing With the Stars, and continue on with business as usual - until it's very late in the game.

In a country where most Americans are relatively disgusted with legislatures, a culture of deception is key to the amazing re-election rate of incumbents, as much so as gerrymandering, fundraising advantage, greater access to press, and the ability to blame the other party or other members of a legislative body. Getting re-elected practically requires officeholders to tell Americans that things are going to be all right with just a few tweaks, rather than requiring a real makeover.

I have always been an optimist. I always believe we can get better. But before healing can start, the true scope and scale of a problem has to be admitted, and sometimes surgery is required. Right now we are facing a number of emergencies that, by and large, our political leadership and our media have refused to face up to. And chief among the qualities I want to see in Illinois's next Senator are both the knowledge and the courage to tell it like it is, so we can start doing, at least tomorrow, what we should have done yesterday. To do anything less is to perpetuate the culture of deception.

Jeff Smith :: The Next Senator from Illinois: Ending the Culture of Deception
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Edit (0.00 / 0)
"McClellan."

Happy Friday!


I'm having trouble with the context (4.00 / 1)
Maybe the context is McClellan's book, which I haven't read. But it seems to me that the problem is not that the American people don't know these things, much less that they have been decieved, but the natural human propensity to put off hard decisions and to do tomorrow what should have been done yesterday. And I can't help feeling this is more something that percolates up from the American electorate than something that filters down from Washington. (No coffee reference intneded. {g})

Take global warming. Thirty years after the first Congressional hearings on the subject, and almost 30 years after I had an article on climate change published in Future Life, my attitude is much more one of burn-out than of surprise. Except I'm a bit surprised that having just one individual take up the issue could revive it so strongly. Maybe there's a lesson there.

But another lesson is that we need real leadership that is actually willing to make the hard decisions. That's what I see in Barack Obama: Someone who will work with others to actually get decisions made and things done. Rather than the pattern we've seen so much in recent years, of using confrontation to keep these things alive as political issues. A senator in the same mold might not be a bad idea.

Bill Thomasson

Permission to reprint explicitly granted


There are two big areas of deception (4.00 / 2)
that are on my mind more and more and that is the financial situations of the State of Illinois and the City of Chicago.  I hope to write more about both of those things at some point.  In regards to the State of Illinois as I dig more into it the more it seems clear that the scope of the current fights about the budget and revenue stream are about as relevant to the actually issue at hand as a discussion of whether to get premium cable or basic cable is to someone whose house is in the process of demolition.  Though it is true that we are talking about a federal level position, all of the people we are talking about live in Illinois and have the ability to contribute to the direction that is being taken.  But do they do so, and do they do it in a way that addresses the actual problem?

Climate change is the same way.  We diddle and diddle and diddle on with these minuscule proposals.  I realize it is difficult to make a bold move happen.  But if you can't even say the words how will you ever do the action?  Gore is right -- in 10 years we need to have no more electricity production from fossil fuels.  Impossible? Maybe.  But it is what the situation calls for.  If I am baking a cake and the recipe calls for 2 cups of flour and I only have a tablespoon of flour left does it make sense to go on discussing if I should gradually add the whole tablespoon or part now and part later or whatever?  No -- I NEED 2 cups of flour and I better start raising heck right now or I'll never get the cake made!

So I guess my question is are they debating the tablespoon or demanding the 2 cups?

Basic stuff: The common wealth should be used for the common good, not to enrich the well-connected few.  


confronting reality (0.00 / 0)
Much has been made of the smartness of Obama's new team. But I'm hoping that their defining characteristic won't be their IQs but their willingness to confront reality

The quote above is from a nice column by Arianna Huffington this week:
Will The Madoff Debacle Finally End The "Who Could Have Known?" Era? Thought it tied in to this diary from this summer.

In hindsight I might have said "culture of denial" rather than "deception." That's a softer and more inclusive characterization. Deception implies we are just victims; denial involves some degree of hiding reality from ourselves.

Another cool line from the column:

It's time to know things again. And to know that you know them.


Prairie State Blue
Front Page - Back Page


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


0 User(s) logged on.
Search




Advanced Search


Misc
View
Powered by: SoapBlox