Bean and Lipinski Weak, Vote with Bush on FISA

by: michael in chicago

Sun Aug 05, 2007 at 09:39:43 AM CDT


Faced with a president with approval ratings in the Nixonian range, GOP favorable numbers plummeting, and public opinion on every single issue favoring Democrats, Democrats again last night stood strong and gave President Bush exactly the FISA legislation he demanded!

I'm so proud to be associated with such a strong party that sees capitulation over such a clearly bad piece of legislation as strength.

And once again, just like a record player that is stuck in a groove, Melissa Bean  (8th Illinois - Blue Dog) and Daniel Lipinski (3rd Illinois) lead the fight to bow down in fear of the popular President and fear mongering Republicans, voting for a bill that gives AG Gonzales, the guy who has difficulty remembering much of anything, more power to spy on Americans.

Can't you feel the strength!

Edit by wegerje added table:
*S 1927*  YEA-AND-NAY  4-Aug-2007  10:20 PM

*QUESTION:*  On Passage

*BILL TITLE:* Protect America Act


Yes No NV
Bold=Dem
CDIllinoisIndianaIowaMichiganMissouriWisconsin
1RushViscloskyBraleyStupakClayRyan
2JacksonDonnellyLoebsackHoekstraAkinBaldwin
3LipinskiSouderBoswellEhlersCarnahanKind
4GutierrezBuyerLathamCampSkeltonMoore
5EmanuelBurtonKingKildeeCleaverSensenbrenner
6RoskamPenceUptonGravesPetri
7DavisCarsonWalbergBluntObey
8BeanEllsworthRogersEmersonKagen
9SchakowskyHillKnollenbergHulshof
10KirkMiller
11WellerMcCotter
12CostelloLevin
13BiggertKilpatrick
14HastertConyers
15JohnsonDingell
16Manzullo
17Hare
18LaHood
19Shimkus

michael in chicago :: Bean and Lipinski Weak, Vote with Bush on FISA
I'll let Meteor Blades say it best:

If anybody asks why in hell you chose to legalize what the Cheney-Bush team has been doing illegally since 2001, you're going to tell us you did it for our own good. You amended the 29-year-old Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act - originally passed to put some modest restrictions on agencies whose outrageous and frequently illegal behavior had been exposed by journalists and the Church Committee - to make us safe. You're going to tell us you've got our backs.

[...]

Frankly, you epitomize weak. Your every pore exudes feebleness. You are surrender monkeys. And you've just casually tossed away a basic protection as if it were a banana peel.

Pressed, I suspect that over the next month some of you will defend this pitiful capitulation with the argument that it's only for six months, and that you'll have a chance to amend the amendment, to rewrite the law more properly. You'll pretend that you won't kiss the President's ass half a year from now when he comes back and says exactly what he said this time: Give me what I want or I'll blame you the next time terrorists kill Americans. Weak is bad enough. Must you be simpletons as well? How many times has he marketed this crap? How many times have you bought it? Do you also fall for those late-night $19.95 television deals for a double-set of knives that never need sharpening?

[...]

If your behavior were mere self-destructiveness, it wouldn't matter quite so much. But you're taking all Americans down with you. The White House still refuses to even say what it is doing. As Greenwald points out:

Vast abuses and criminality in surveillance remain undisclosed, uninvestigated and unimpeded because Congressional Democrats have stood meekly by while the administration refuses to disclose what it has been doing in how it spies on us. ...

Congressional Democrats know virtually nothing about how the Bush administration has been eavesdropping on our conversations because the administration refused to tell them and they passively accepted this state of affairs.

I'm disgusted and embarrassed to call myself a Democrat today. You've voted to essentially give Bush and Gonzales more power while they have ignored Congressional oversight, thumbed their noses at requests for information about what they are doing and how they have already broken the law relating to FISA, and you are giving in to them for fear of looking weak.

Here's a clue: You look pathetically weak in this move and deserve the label that Republicans have given you.

So now what? Primary:

We can't do it by leaving the party, or the country, or by burying our heads in the sand.  But we can do it by doing what we do.  Being activists.  Leading.  Changing the hearts and minds of the people.  Then they will change the hearts and minds of the Reps.  And, in the districts where the Democrats won easily, there's a thing called a primary.

Mark Pera is running against Lipinski. His slogan so far is "It's time for a change." Damn straight. Here are his views. Here is his Act Blue page where I suggest you donate to his campaign.

I firmly agree with Meteor Blades: I've had it with the pathetic excuses. If Democrats elected to stand up to Bush will not, it's time to act and replace them. They no longer deserve our support if they can cave so easily and vote for such a bad piece a legislation that knowingly gives more cover to Bush's violation of the law.

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
One Point to Remember (0.00 / 0)
This legislation does not create the power to put anyone under surveillance who could not be surveilled under FISA. What it does is the give the Executive Branch (in effect, mid-level NSA functionaries) power to do this entirely on their own, bypassing the prior court oversight thtat FISA requires.

I agree that this is a very bad law. The last thing we need to do is expand the powers of the Executive Branch to operate arbitrarily with no deference to other branches of government. Even the fact that it's only for six months is hardly an excuse.

I'm already supporting Pera. But if I weren't, this would be a very strong reason to do so.

Bill Thomasson

Permission to reprint explicitly granted


Johnson deserves some love here (0.00 / 0)
and maybe even Hastert and LaHood. Admittedly that's hard to do on the Hastert case.

Jeff Wegerson

Johnson most of all (0.00 / 0)
He was one of only two Repubs to break with the party on this vote.

[ Parent ]
Donnelly is rapidly becomeing a Blue Dog it seems. (0.00 / 0)
I keep seeing him on the wrong side of things.

Jeff Wegerson

Prairie State Blue
Front Page - Back Page


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


0 User(s) logged on.
Search




Advanced Search


Misc
View
Powered by: SoapBlox